Expert Answer :Cohesion and coherence article.

  

Solved by verified expert:This is a summary of an article now i want a power point explaining this summary. 4-5 Slides is enough.
text_linguistic_ass1.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Expert Answer :Cohesion and coherence article.
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

Lena Alattas
S14106947
Text Linguistic & Translation.
Intact discourse cohesion and coherence following bilateral
ventromedial prefrontal cortex
Being among widely studied macro-linguistics measures of discourse production, discourse
cohesion and coherence gives communication its continuity providing the grammatical and
lexical links which hold texts together. According to Halliday & Hasan (1976), cohesive ties act
as the indicators for word and sentence on the relations. These indicators allow researchers who
engage participants to create rhythm when conversing about a given topics. The study explains
that difference between cohesion and coherence. Whereas coherence stresses on the overall
meaning, cohesion involves the continuity within and between specific sentences.
According to several researchers conducted in the past with an objective of reviewing and
analyzing how hippocampal declarative memory can help discourse cohesion and coherence.
Several studies have been conducted in the past to help examine how hippocampal declarative
memory may be used to discourse coherence. As Kurczek & Duff (2001) stipulates, in many
cases the adequacy of the ties is more often concluded to be incomplete as their ratings drop
below comparison participants as they produced fewer cohesive ties.
Analysis of cohesion and coherence is carried out in line with Kurczek and Duff (2011).
According to them, the standard data analysis procedure of cohesion and coherence involves
scheming variety of discourse through several methods say procedural, storytelling or picture
description amongst both healthy participants and those with vmPFC damage as shown in table
1. A clear observation from the table shows that despite vmPFC participants possessing well
documented morbid changes in both social and emotional processing to determine if their
psychological profiles are firm.
Table 2 shows the findings of the frequency of cohesive ties. It can be seen from the table that
the total ties exhibited by cohesion was 3133 in both comparison participant and vmPFC. Also,
the table shows no great differences in the number of ties across individual task. Story retelling =
0.04, generation= 0.76, narrative = 0.26 and procedural = 0.32. the results in the first row present
the average number of ties associated with cohesion. According to the results shown in table 2, it
is easy to conclude that in spoken discourse cohesion and coherence is free of impairment effects
from bilateral vmPFC damages.
It’s also evident from the previous studies that the means and ways of acquisition and common
ground usage does not depend upon vmPFC (Gupta, Tranel, & Duff, 2012). Furthermore,
converging and familiarizing to become similar with various linguistic variable across the
conversation several findings reveals (Gupta, Tranel, & Duff, 2011).
Participants with vmPFC damage were conditioned through various tests which was in
accordance to standard test limits as tabulated in table 1. Using the procedure stated by Kurczek
and Duff (2011) analysis of cohesion and coherence is performed across three narratives and
procedural discourse. During this analysis, transcripts are recorded for different number of
sentences, the utterance is distributed into T – units and each word in the false start are included
in the total word count. Although the findings show that comparison participants produced more
words than vmPFC participants, the difference is not significant to cause any difference. T- unit
is an independent clause or any associated subordinate clauses (Hunt, 1970). Lastly, testing the
reliability of the set data is important and examined through several analyses.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP