Expert Answer :Literature Review

  

Solved by verified expert:The Literature Review is the part of your Mini-Proposal in which you review other studies and journal articles that address your proposal, problem, questions, hypothesis, methodology possibilities, and similar studies to the one you are proposing. You then create your literature review from the information gleaned that speak to your proposed plan. You will also use data from the Texas Academic Performance Reports (TAPR) for your school or district that will substantiate the need for your research.The Literature Review assignment is spread over two units because of the breadth of the assignment. After reading through a number of scholarly articles, journals, and other studies, select at least 10 scholarly references to cite in your paper. Citations included in the body must match those on the references page and are formatted in APA style.Write your literature review in an organized and flowing manner so that it is not just pieces of quoted sources tacked together.Submit the Literature Review. Remember this will follow your Mini-Proposal Introduction as you put your Mini-Proposal together in Unit 5. Be guided by the template and rubric for the Literature Review.Attached documents include:Text book Ch. 1-5 , Ch. 6-7 will be attached within 24 hours. Sorry, I am having issues with my scanner.Creswell, J. (2015). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (5th ed.). Pearson, Publishing. ISBN 13:9780133549645Grading RubricLiterature Review TemplateMini Proposal TemplateMini Proposal Introduction (unrevised)All writing should be written in APA 6th ed. including coverpage, in-text citations with pg numbers for any direct quotes as necessary and reference page
grading_rubrics.docx

literature_review_paper_template.docx

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Expert Answer :Literature Review
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

mini_proposal_introduction_template.docx

medu5143_w1_mini_proposal.doc

ed_research_1_5.pdf

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Interactive Assessment Grading Rubric
Excellent
Good
Acceptable
A Level
B Level
C Level
Criteria
5 points
Frequency
5 points
Initial Post
25 points
Needs
Improvement
D-F Level
4 points
Participates
frequently
throughout
the unit
3.5 points
0 points
Participates several
Participates 1-2
times but postings
times on the same Does not participate
not distributed over
day
time
25 points
20 points
Posts well
developed
assignment
that fully
addresses
and develops
all aspects of
the task.
Posts well
developed
assignment that
addresses all
aspects of the task;
lacks full
development of
concepts.
17.5 points
Posts adequate
assignment with
0 points
superficial thought
and preparation;
Not completed
doesn’t address all
aspects of the
task.
20 points
Follow-up
Postings
20 points
Demonstrates
analysis of
others’ posts;
extends
meaningful
discussion by
building on
previous
posts.
14 points
16 points
Elaborates on an
existing posting
with further
comment or
observation.
Posts shallow
contribution to
discussion (e.g.,
agrees or
disagrees); does
not enrich
discussion.
24 points
21 points
Posts information
that is factually
correct; lacks full
development of
concept or thought.
Repeats but does
not add
substantive
information to the
discussion.
0 points
Not completed
30 points
Posts
factually
Content
Contribution correct,
reflective and
30 points
substantive
contribution;
advances
discussion.
0 points
Information is
incorrect, irrelevant
or off topic
15 points
12 points
10.5 points
References
0 points
and Support Uses
Incorporates some Uses personal
No references or
references to references from
experience, but no
Score
15 points
literature,
readings, or
personal
experience to
support
comments.
Uses
professional
and peerreviewed
sources.
literature and
personal
experience.
references to
readings or
research.
supporting evidence
4 points
3.5 points
0 points
Contributes
valuable
information to
discussion with
minor clarity or
mechanics errors
Communicates in
friendly, courteous
and helpful
manner with some
errors in clarity or
mechanics.
Posts long,
unorganized content
that may contain
multiple errors or
may be
inappropriate.
References are
from layperson
sources
5 points
Clarity,
Mechanics
and Style
5 points
Contributes to
discussion
with clear,
concise
comments
formatted in
an easy to
read style
that is free of
grammatical
or spelling
errors.
Total Score
Search and Find and Analyzing Research Assignments Grading Rubric
Excellent
Good
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
A Level
B Level
C Level
D-F Level
Category
Score
50 points
Quality of
Information
50 points
Organization
10 points
40 points
35 points
Information clearly
relates to the main
topic. It includes
several supporting
details and/or
examples.
Information clearly
relates to the main
topic. It provides 1-2
supporting details
and/or examples.
Information clearly
relates to the main
topic. Insufficient
details and/or
examples are given.
10 points
8 points
7 points
Information is very
organized with wellconstructed
paragraphs and
Information is
organized with wellconstructed
paragraphs.
Organization of
information and
construction of
paragraphs need
0 points
Information has little
or nothing to do with
the main topic.
0 points
The information is
disorganized.
subheadings.
Amount of
Information
15 points
improving.
15 points
12 points
10.5 points
All subtopics are
addressed and all
questions answered
with strong
elaboration.
All subtopics are
addressed and most
questions answered
with adequate
elaboration.
0 points
All subtopics are
addressed, and most One or more
questions answered subtopics were not
with minimal
addressed.
elaboration.
8 points
7 points
All sources
(information and
graphics) are
accurately
documented in the
desired format.
All sources
(information and
graphics) are
accurately
documented, but a
few are not in the
desired format.
All sources
(information and
graphics) are
accurately
documented, but
many are not in the
desired format.
0 points
15 points
12 points
10.5 points
0 points
No grammatical,
spelling or
punctuation errors.
Almost no
A few grammatical,
grammatical, spelling spelling, or
or punctuation errors punctuation errors.
10 points
Sources
10 points
Mechanics
15 points
Some sources are
not accurately
documented; format
is incorrect.
Many grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors.
Total Score
Mini-Proposal Introduction Grading Rubric
Excellent
Good
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
A Level
B Level
C Level
D-F Level
Category
Score
5 points
Title page includes:
4 points
Title Page
5 points
·
Title of the proposed
project
Title page is missing
·
Your Name
one of the requested
·
Course number
components.
·
Submission date
Introductory 10 points
Section
Topic is described clearly
10 points
with supporting literature
3.5 points
Title page is
missing two of
the requested
components.
0 points
Title page is not
included.
8 points
7 points
0 points
Topic is described
well but lacks
Topic is
described
Topic is vague and
unclear; supporting
citations.
adequate supporting adequately but
literature citations.
includes no
supporting
literature
citations.
literature is missing.
16 points
14 points
0 points
Problem and
purpose are
described in the
requested style.
Problem and
purpose are
described
adequately.
Lacks either a
problem or purpose
statement and/or is
missing both.
20 points
·
Problem and
purpose statements are
clearly described and
supported.
·
The problem section
begins with a single
Problem and declarative sentence, “The
problem is . . . .”(Avoid
Purpose
words such as should,
20 points
must, needs, because, etc.
Simply state the problem.
Do not include a cause of
the problem or a solution.
·
The purpose section
begins with a single
declarative sentence, “The
purpose of this project is. . .
.“
10 points
·
The need,
importance, or significance
of the proposed project
8 points
is clearly described.
Significance
Significance of the
of the Study ·
Includes why the
study is missing one
study is important to the
10 points
of the requested
local level.
elements.
·
Explains how the
project may connect to a
larger population or
problem.
10 points
8 points
7 points
Significance of
the study is
missing two of
the requested
elements.
0 points
Significance of the
study is either
underdeveloped or
not included.
7 points
Organization Information is very
organized with well10 points
constructed paragraphs
and subheadings.
Information is
organized with wellconstructed
paragraphs.
Organization of 0 points
information and
The information is
construction of
disorganized.
paragraphs need
improving.
APA
10 points
(References
·
All references and
and
8 points
7 points
0 points
All sources
All sources
Some sources are
Citations)
10 points
citations are in accordance (information and
with APA.
graphics) are
accurately
·
Reference list is in
documented, but a
alphabetical order
few are not in the
according to the last name desired format.
of the first author in any
source.
(information and not accurately
graphics) are
documented; format
accurately
is incorrect.
documented, but
many are not in
the desired
format.
10 points
·
Paragraphs are
indented a full ½ inch.
·
Line spacing is
standard and
consistent: double spacing
throughout including the
spaces between headings,
paragraphs, and
8 points
APA
references.
(General
Paper adheres to
Formatting) ·
Margins are
most of the
consistent (1 inch top,
formatting
10 points
bottom, and right, 1.5 inch requirements.
left)
7 points
Paper adheres
minimally to
formatting
requirements.
0 points
Few of the formatting
requirements are
followed.
·
Formatting of block
quotes is consistent with
APA format.
·
Font style is
consistent throughout (size
12 Times New Roman is
recommended)
10.5 points
15 points
Mechanics
15 points
10 points
0 points
A few
Almost no
grammatical,
No grammatical, spelling or
grammatical, spelling spelling, or
punctuation errors.
or punctuation errors punctuation
errors.
10 points
Overall
Rating
12 points
8 points
Topic is relevant for
Topic selected is an
educators.
especially important one for
Introduction may
educators. Introduction
need more
provides a complete picture
clarification on what
of what the researcher
the researcher
hopes to accomplish by the
hopes to accomplish
study.
by the study.
Many grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors.
7 points
Topic is
somewhat
unclear or
inappropriate for
a study. Reader
might not be
able to ascertain
what the
researcher
0 points
Topic is unclear.
Reader will have
difficulty ascertaining
what the researcher
hopes to accomplish
by the study.
hopes to
accomplish by
the study.
Total Score
Literature Review Grading Rubric
Excellent
Good
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
A Level
B Level
C Level
D-F Level
Category
Score
15 points
Contains all the following
elements:
·
Includes at least
10 sources
·
Sources are
selected from peerreviewed journals or
books (may be online
journals form
professional
organizations).
12 points
Selection of
10.5 points
·
Web-based
Sources
Contains three of
Contains two of the
sources are from
the requested
15 points
requested elements.
professional
elements.
organizations,
government agencies, or
other reputable sources –
may not exceed 20% of
total sources)
0 points
Does not include the
requested elements.
·
Majority of sources
must be published within
the past five years.
(Seminal/landmark
studies and theoretical
foundation information is
the exception to this)
Introduction
10 points
10 points
8 points
7 points
0 points
Literature review begins
with a well-written, clear
introduction; connects to
the topic and purpose
Introduction is
mostly clear and
connects to the
topic and purpose
Introduction
is underdeveloped
and some or part of it
does not connect to
Introduction is
unclear and does not
connect to the topic
and purpose
Key Topics
20 points
identified in the previous
paper.
of previous paper. topic and purpose of
previous paper.
20 points
16 points
·
Each primary topic
and subtopic related to
the proposed project is
addressed with headings
and strong elaboration.
·
All topics
and subtopics are
addressed with
adequate
elaboration.
·
The basic theory or
conceptual foundation for
the proposal is presented
and documented.
·
Theory or
conceptual foundation is
directly connected to
purpose identified in the
previous paper.
·
Basic
theory or
conceptual
foundation is
presented;
adequately
documented and
connected to
purpose identified
in previous paper.
10 points
8 points
Appropriate transitions
between topics are
clearly evident.
Information is
organized with
well-constructed
paragraphs.
Transitions
between topics
are mostly
evident.
10 points
8 points
Information is very
organized with wellOrganization constructed paragraphs
and subheadings.
10 points
identified in the
previous paper.
14 points
0 points
·
Most subtopics
are addressed with
·
One or more
minimal elaboration. topics or subtopics
are not addressed.
·
Basic theory
and/or conceptual
·
Basic theory
foundation is
and/or conceptual
minimally
foundation is not
documented and may documented and not
not be directly
connected to
connected to purpose purpose identified in
identified in previous previous paper.
paper.
7 points
Organization of
information and
construction of
paragraphs need
improving. Transitions
between topics
minimal.
0 points
The information is
disorganized. No
transitions between
topics evident.
7 points
0 points
APA
·
All references and
(References citations are in
and
accordance with APA.
Citations)
·
Reference list is in
10 points
alphabetical order
according to the last
name of the first author in
any source.
All sources
(information and
graphics) are
accurately
documented, but
a few are not in
the desired
format.
All sources
(information and
graphics) are
accurately
documented, but
many are not in the
desired format.
8 points
7 points
Paper adheres to
most of the
formatting
requirements.
Paper adheres
minimally to
formatting
requirements.
Some sources are
not accurately
documented; format
is incorrect.
10 points
APA
·
Left margin
(General
alignment with ½ inch
Formatting) paragraph indentions.
10 points
·
Line spacing is
standard and consistent;
double spacing
0 points
Few of the formatting
requirements are
followed.
throughout, including
spaces between
headings, paragraphs,
and references.
·
Margins are
consistent (1 inch top,
bottom, and right; 1.5
inch lest)
·
Formatting of block
quotes is consistent with
APA format.
12 points
Mechanics
15 points
10.5 points
15 points
Almost no
A few grammatical,
No grammatical, spelling grammatical,
spelling, or
or punctuation errors.
spelling or
punctuation errors.
punctuation errors
0 points
Many grammatical,
spelling, or
punctuation errors.
8 points
Overall
Rating
10 points
10 points
Selected literature was
pertinent for study with
connections made to
problem and purpose.
Selected literature
was mostly
relevant for the
proposed study
and is connected
to problem and
purpose.
7 points
0 points
Some of the selected
literature was not
relevant for study,
and/or connections
are unclear.
Literature review was
underdeveloped and
not representative of
graduate-level work.
Total Score
Design and Methodology Plan Grading Rubric
Excellent
Good
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
A Level
B Level
C Level
D-F Level
Category
Score
20 points
16 points
·
Describes the project
methodology:
Describes both
the
methodology
and the project
design but does
not have
literature to
support choice
of design.
Description of
the Proposed
o Qualitative
Project Design o Quantitative
o Mixed Methods
20 points
·
Describes the project
design:
o
Action research
14 points
Methodology and
project design
are described but
needs
improvement.
0 points
Either project
methodology and/or
project design are
missing.
o
o
o
o
o
o
Case study
Phenomenology
Comparative
Descriptive
Correlational
Quasi-experimental
·
Supports choice of
design with literature.
10 points
·
Describes the tool(s)
you will use to collect your
data.
o Survey of teacher
perceptions
o Archived student
standardized test scores?
o Interviews with parents
or others?
Instrumentation o Observation checklists?
o Other?
10 points
8 points
7 points
Description of
Description of
tools used to
tools used to
collect data are
collect data are
·
Description is specific. described well. somewhat
unclear.
o Is it self-designed?
o Is it from another
source?(If it is from another
source, such as a
standardized test used in
your school, a survey you
found online, etc., be sure to
list the source clearly and
place it in the references.)
0 points
Description of tools
used to collect data
is either missing or
very unclear.
10 points
·
Clearly describes the
“setting” for the proposed
study.
Setting and
Participants
10 points
o Where will your study
take place?
o What does the school,
organization, or community
“look like”?
8 points
Describes both
the setting and
the participants
with an answer
·
Clearly describes the to all the
participants for the proposed questions.
study.
o Who will participate in
your study? Students,
teachers, parents, etc.?
o What does the
participant group “look like”
7 points
Describes the
setting and the
participants but
does not provide
the answer to all
the questions.
0 points
Does not provide a
description of the
setting or participants
of the proposed
study.
in terms of age,
demographics, grade level in
school, etc.?
10 points
Clearly describes how 8 points
Data Collection ·
the data will be collected for Describes how
and Analysis
each research question.
Procedures
data will be
·
Clearly describes how collected and
10 points
the data will be analyzed for analyzed.
7 points
Describes how
data will be
collected but not
how it will be
analyzed.
0 points
Data collection and
analysis procedures
are not included in
the plan.
each research question.
10 points
Organization
10 points
Information is
Information is very organized
organized with
with well-constructed
wellparagraphs and
constructed
subheadings.
paragraphs.
10 points
APA
(References
and Citations)
10 points
8 points
8 points
All sources
(information
and graphics)
are accurately
·
Reference list is in
documented,
alphabetical order according but a few are
to the last name of the first
not in the
author in any source.
desired format.
·
All references and
citations are in accordance
with APA.
7 points
Organization of 0 points
information and
The information is
construction of
disorganized.
paragraphs need
improving.
7 points
All sources
(information and
graphics) are
accurately
documented, but
many are not in
the desired
format.
0 points
Some sources are
not accurately
documented; format
is incorrect.
10 points
APA (General
Formatting)
10 points
·
Left margin alignment
with ½ inch paragraph
indentions.
·
Line spacing is
standard and consistent;
double spacing throughout,
including spaces between
headings, paragraphs, and
references.
·
Margins are consistent
(1 inch top, bottom, and
right; 1.5 inch lest)
·
Formatting of block
quotes is consistent with
APA format.
Mechanics
10 points
10 points
No grammatical, spelling or
8 points
7 points
Paper adheres
to most of the
formatting
requirements.
Paper adheres
minimally to
formatting
requirements.
Few of the formatting
requirements are
followed.
8 points
7 points
0 points
Almost no
grammatical,
A few
grammatical,
Many grammatical,
spelling, or
0 points
punctuation errors.
spelling or
punctuation
errors
10 points
Overall Rating
10 points
spelling, or
punctuation
errors.
punctuation errors.
7 points
Design and methodology
plan is appropriate for topic
selected. Instrumentation is
clearly described, and plan
demonstrates scholarly
work.
8 points
Plan is clear
and appropriate
for study and
well written.
Plan is somewhat 0 points
unclear and
research design Plan is unclear and
may not be
poorly written.
appropriate for
the topic.
Total Score
Final
Mini-Proposal Project Grading Rubric
Excellent
Good
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
A Level
B Level
C Level
D-F Level
Category
Score
5 points

Abstract
5 points



Provides an overall
summary of the project
including purpose,
significance, and
design
Identifies who will
benefit from the study
Maximum 300 words
Block format – not
indented – double
spaced
4 points
0 points
Two of the
Abstract adheres
requested
to the requested
Abstract is not
guidelines for the
guidelines with
included.
abstract were not
one exception.
followed.
5 points
Table of
Contents
5 points
Introduction
3.5 points
3.5 points
·
Table of Contents is
complete with appropriate
level 1 and 2 headings
·
Ellipsis dots between
text of heading and page
numbers
·
Includes any tables,
figures, and appendices
4 points
Table of
Contents is
mostly well
presented.
Table of
Contents does
0 points
not include
headings, and/or Table of Contents is
not included.
ellipsis dots, or
page numbers.
5 points
4 points
3.5 points
0 points
Several of the
Requested revisions
·
Reflects all revisions Most of the
5 points
noted in the introductory
paper
requested
revisions from
the introductory
·
Includes a statement paper are made;
of the importance of the
significance
project by identifying
clearly
precisely why the study is established.
important at both the local
level and for a larger
population
Statement of
the Problem
5 points
and Purpose of
Reflects all revisions noted
the Proposed
in the problem and purpose
Study
section
5 points
requested
not made.
revisions were
not made, and/or
significance of
study is
incomplete.
4 points
3.5 Points
Most of the
requested
revisions were
made.
Several of the
requested
revisions were
not made.
0 points
Requested revisions
not made.
10 points
Literature
Review
10 …
Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP