Expert answer:Case analysis: The Case of Dr. Cecil Jacobson

Solved by verified expert:The Case of Dr. Cecil JacobsonA physician was recently convicted of using his own sperm for artificially inseminatinghis patients. He told the court that he didn’t see anything wrong with this practicebecause these women came to him wanting to have a child. However, his patientswere unaware that he was using his own sperm for the procedure. Some of his officestaff became suspicious of the physician’s methods, but failed to report their suspicionsimmediately. Many children were conceived as a result of this physician’s spermhaving been implanted into the mothers.Questions1. Is this a legal, ethical, or bioethical issue? Explain your answer.It is a legal, ethical, and bioethical issue.2. Was the office staff at fault?3. What is the potential long-term effect for this physician’s patients and membersof the surrounding community?4. What should happen to this physician?
guidelinesforcaseanalysis.doc

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Expert answer:Case analysis: The Case of Dr. Cecil Jacobson
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

How to analyze cases
I.
Identify the relevant facts relating to all aspects of the case being discussed.
A. Medical facts
Medical facts include (but are not limited to):
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Diagnosis/prognosis (chance of recovery).
Course of present illness/hospitalization.
History of treatments and results.
Possible treatments with their potential benefits and risks.
Status of daily living skills (ambulation, feeding, hydration, communication,
and so on)
6. Patient’s emotional state.
7. Patient’s decisional capacity (competence).
The level of decisional capacity for any particular patient falls somewhere along a
continuum from fully capable (awake, conscious of one’s environment, capable of
expressing one’s wishes, and stable) to totally incapable (in a persistent vegetative
state or an irreversible coma).
A patient’s decisional capacity may also falls somewhere between the two extremes:
For example:
a. A patient who is aware and informed, yet is distraught or confused.
b. A patient who is otherwise aware and informed, yet changes his mind
constantly and is inconsistent.
c. A patient who be stable and aware yet is not fully informed.
B. Patient’s beliefs and wishes.
1. Patient’s wishes.
2. Cultural and religious beliefs that are relevant to decision-making.
C. Interested parties (who has something to gain or to loose)
1. Society at large
2. Institutions-Hospitals, medical professions.
3. Individuals—their rights, duties, competence, values, and authority.
a. Spouse.
b. Adult or minor children.
c. Surrogate/proxy (someone who has been designated to make decisions of behalf
of the patient in case the latter is incapacitated).
d. Significant other.
e. Health care providers.
f. Conflicts among these individuals or between any of them and the patient, if any.
D. Legal/administrative concerns.
1. Financial considerations.
2. What the law says.
3. Hospital policies.
II. Identify the ethical issues/conflicts.
A. Articulate the problem.
B. What makes the situation an ethical problem:
1. Uncertainty. When decision-makers sense that there is something wrong, yet are
unable to identify the moral problem or when they do not know which moral
principle or value applies.
2. Conflict over the application of an ethical principle.
3. Moral dilemmas.
a. A choice must be made between two (or more) possible courses of action all of
which appear at first glance to be moral.
Example: in the case of a terminally ill patient both to keep the patient alive and
to let him die are both morally right one based on the belief that it is
morally right to preserve life, the other on the belief that it is morally wrong to
prolong suffering.
b. There is a conflict between two different moral principles. To choose one is to
infringe on another.
Example:
The patient refuses treatment and is aware that, as a result, he will die. The
physician feels that he has a duty to continue to treat cure and prolong life. This a
case of conflict between autonomy and beficence.
III. Identify options
A. List the different courses of action that are available.
For example:
1. Treat aggressively: initiate new therapies, perform surgery, resuscitate if patient goes
into cardiopulmonary arrest.
2. Continue present level of treatment: maintain current level of medication, maintain
all presently used, and maintain current CODE status.
3. Provide palliative care: use medications for pain control, do not initiate therapy if
condition deteriorates, and do not resuscitate (DNR) CODE status.
4. Withdraw life-sustaining treatment: discontinue curative medications, disconnect the
ventilator, discontinue artificial feeding and hydration, and do not resuscitate
B. Identify the potentially positive and the potentially negative consequences of each course
of action for the patient and for all the interested parties.
C. Rank the different options from an ethical point of view:
1. Identify the basic moral principle of moral theory that underlies each option.
2. Find out which course of action results in the greatest good (consequentialismbeneficence) and the least harm (consequentialism-nonmaleficence) while at the
same time respects the rights, dignity, and integrity of all persons involved
(deontology, virtue ethics, autonomy).
IV.
State the most ethically sound option and the justification for it.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP