Expert answer:Ethical and spiritual assignment 1

  

Solved by verified expert:Details:Write an 800-1,000 word essay on your personal worldview. Briefly discuss the various possible meanings of the term “spirituality,” and your understanding of the concepts of pluralism, scientism, and postmodernism. Primarily, address the following seven basic worldview questions:
What is prime reality?
What is the nature of the world around you?
What is a human being?
What happens to a person at death?
Why is it possible to know anything at all?
How do people know what is right or wrong?
What is the meaning of human history?
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.LectureWorldview Foundations of Spirituality and EthicsIntroductionThere has been an increase of interest in the role of spirituality in health care, as well as in the workplace and other fields in general. This interest has been met with a variety of responses, including an uneasiness that has historical roots. There is generally a perceived tension between science and religion/spirituality. This estrangement between the worlds of science and religion is in some ways not truly reflective of some inherent incompatibility between science and religion per se, but rather a reflection of underlying worldview tensions. The rediscovery of spirituality and its implications for health care provides recognition that the estrangement between the two worlds has not served patients’ best interests. If this is the case, then part of the task of serving patients well will require some basic worldview training in order to not only understand patients’ own backgrounds more clearly, but to also promote the fruitful interaction of science and religion in the health care setting more generally.Spirituality and WorldviewThe theoretical and practical foundations of any discipline or field take place within the wider framework of what is known as a worldview. A “worldview” is a term that describes a complete way of viewing the world around you. For example, consider religion and/or culture. For many people, their religion or culture colors the way in which they view their entire reality; nothing is untouched by it and everything is within its scope. Yet one need not be religious to have a worldview; atheism or agnosticism are also worldviews. Thus, all of one’s fundamental beliefs, practices, and relationships are seen through the lens of a worldview. The foundations of medicine and health care in general bring with it a myriad of assumptions about the very sorts of questions answered in a person’s worldview. Consider carefully the seven questions in the Called to Care textbook in order to begin grasping more clearly the concept of a worldview.A Challenging EthosA fundamental thesis of this course is that two sorts of underlying philosophies or beliefs about the nature of knowledge, namely, scientism and relativism, are at the heart of this perceived tension between science and religion. Moreover, scientism and relativism help explain to some degree why this tension has not served the best interests of patients, and is even at odds with the fundamental goals of medicine and care.Scientism is the belief that the best or only way to have any knowledge of reality is by means of the sciences (Moreland and Craig, 2003, pp. 346-350). At first glance this might sound like a noncontroversial or even commonsensical claim. However, think about this carefully. One way to state this is to say that if something is not known scientifically then it is not known at all. In other words, the only way to hold true beliefs about anything is to know them scientifically. Relativism on the other hand is the view that there is no such thing as truth in the commonsensical sense of that concept. Every claim about the nature of reality is simply relative to either an individual or a society/culture. Thus, according to this way of thinking, it might be true here in the United States that equality is a good thing, but in some Middle Eastern countries it is simply not a concern. Yet there is no ultimate truth of the matter, it is simply a matter of individual or popular opinion. In some way, truth is just what an individual or a culture decides that it is, and therefore not truly discovered, but invented.The current context of health care and medicine in the West is defined by an ethos (the prevailing attitudes and beliefs of a culture) of scientism and relativism. This ethos has exacerbated the perceived philosophical and cultural tension between science and religion. The result has been a general relativizing and caricaturing of religion, and the elevation of science as the default epistemology for all things rational or even true.While scientism may seem commonsensical or rational at first glance, a closer examination reveals glaring weaknesses. It should be noted right from the outset that scientism is not equivalent to science. This is because scientism is a philosophy about the nature and limits of science as well as the extent of human knowledge. Scientism is a philosophical thesis that claims that science is the only methodology to gain knowledge; every other claim to knowledge is either mere opinion or false.One of the most pressing dilemmas for scientism is science’s inability to make moral or ethical judgments. To understand why, consider the nature of scientific claims and their distinction from moral or ethical judgments. General scientific claims can be described simply as the attempt to make descriptions of fact. But when people make moral or ethical judgments, they do not simply make statements of fact (though that is part of it), but are evaluating those fact claims. Thus when making a moral judgment people are evaluating whether some fact is good or bad. Thus consider the distinction between the following statements:(1) 90% of Americans believe that racism is wrong.(2) Racism is wrong.Statement (1) is a statement of fact in the sense that it is meant to describe the way things actually are, or what is the case. Statement (2) however, makes a judgment; it makes a normative claim in the sense that it is making a claim about what ought to be the case. Statement (2) is not simply reporting or describing the facts. It is saying that it is not the way it is supposed to be. In recognizing these differences, a crucial distinction has surfaced between (1) scientific claims and (2) moral and ethical claims. Scientific claims are limited to statements of description; they are solely claims about what is the case. Moral and ethical statements are prescriptive and are evaluative claims about what ought to be the case. This has been described as the fact-value distinction to designate the difference between facts and values, values being a prescription of the way things ought to be, the moral evaluation of facts. This distinction has also been described as the “is” (fact) versus “ought” (value) distinction.Thus, because science deals with mere facts, it is not in a position to say anything about what ought to be the case. Science is relevant to moral and ethical claims in interesting ways, but prescriptive statements about what morally ought to be the case are simply beyond the bounds of science. To try to derive what ought to be the case only from what is the case is a logical fallacy. If one were to look at the world and the way things are, and then claim that it simply follows that it is the way it ought to be does not match the experience of morality. There are many events that are the case and describe what is (genocide, war, hatred, murder), but whether or not they ought to be that way is a further question that science is not in a position to answer. Thus to try to derive an ought from an is refers to what is called the fallacy of deriving of ought from an is. Much more could be said of the inadequacy of scientism, but it should be noted that moral, ethical, and religious claims all involve normative claims about the way the world ought to be. One practical effect within health care has been the subtle but pervasive view that religion is a harmless tangent to medicine and health care at best, and a superstitious and destructive distraction at worst.Recently there has been a resurgence and appreciation of spirituality within medicine in more holistic approaches to health care. For example, the Center for Spirituality, Theology and Health at Duke University was established in 1998 for the purpose ofconducting research, training others to conduct research, and promoting scholarly field-building activities related to religion, spirituality, and health. The Center serves as a clearinghouse for information on this topic, and seeks to support and encourage dialogue between researchers, clinicians, theologians, clergy, and others interested in the intersection. (Center for Spirituality, 2014, para. 1)While a welcome corrective, it is easy to inadvertently buy into weaker forms of scientism and fail to appreciate the particularity of each religion by reducing all religion to a generic spirituality. For example, Burkhardt (1999) attempts to defend a generic definition of the term “spirituality” (p. 71), but Shelly and Miller (2006) point out the inadequacy of such a strategy. It is not fair or respectful to paint all religions or worldviews with the same brush under the heading of spirituality and ignore the differences.Thus, in the interest of philosophical clarity, religious sensitivity, and genuine care, this section will introduce fundamental concepts and challenge the contemporary ethos to make room for genuine religious dialogue.The Foundations of Christian Spirituality in HealthcareIn stark contrast to this ethos is the Christian tradition and the resources it provides for a rich conception of care. Contra scientism and relativism, the foundations of Christian spirituality in health care, includes two attitudes/theses: (1) an acknowledgement of science as a subset of knowledge in general, and a deep appreciation for science as a collective human enterprise that reflects the knowability and order of creation; and (2) the goodness and worth of this creation (in so far as it reflects God’s creative intention) with human beings bearing special dignity and intrinsic worth, reflected in the well-known bioethical principle of “respect for persons” (National Commission, 1979).The foundations of Christian spirituality in health care assume genuine knowledge of God and his purposes. Central to this foundation are the biblical Christian narrative and the person of Jesus Christ. In order to appreciate and do justice to this center, the ethos of scientism and postmodernism must be first challenged and dispelled.This first topic of this course is devoted to understanding the concept of worldview in detail and to begin to challenge the philosophies of relativism and scientism. It will also begin to lay the foundations of a broadly holistic understanding of the relationship between spirituality and health care in general, and a Christian worldview for health care in general.ReferencesBurkhardt, M. (1989). Spirituality: An analysis of the concept holistic nursing practice. New York, NY: Aspen Publishers, Inc.Center for Spirituality, Theology and Health. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.spiritualityandhealth.duke.edu/Moreland, J.P., & Craig, W.L. (2003). Philosophial foundations for a Christian worldview. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/bel…Shelly, J. A., & Miller, A. B. (2006). Called to care: A Christian worldview for nursing (2nd ed.). Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic.
rubric_1.docx

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Expert answer:Ethical and spiritual assignment 1
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

Personal Worldview Inventory
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
70.0 %Content
25.0 %
Comprehension
of Pertinent
Terms
2
Less than
Satisfactory
65.00%
The concept of
There is surface
spirituality is not
coverage of the
analyzed clearly,
concept of
and no distinctions spirituality, with
are made among
some distinctions,
possible meanings but demonstrating
of the term. Only
poor or unclear
one meaning for the grasp of these
term spirituality is distinctions. There
assumed. There is is a poor grasp and
no discussion or
application of
discernible grasp of scientism and
the concepts of
postmodernism to
pluralism, scientism, the concept of
and postmodernism. spirituality.
45.0 % Personal The analysis does The analysis
Worldview
not answer all seven answers all seven
Analysis
questions and there questions but with
is no discussion of minimal thought
the interconnection and any attempt at
of the questions and interconnection of
their implications. the questions has
little to no
relevance.
20.0
%Organization
and Effectiveness
7.0 % Thesis
Paper lacks any
Development and discernible overall
Purpose
purpose or
organizing claim.
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
4
Good
85.00%
At least two senses At least two senses
of spirituality are of spirituality,
distinguished,
including from the
though the grasp of text, are
that distinction may distinguished.
be shallow. Grasp of Description of how
scientism and
spirituality is
postmodernism is broadly defined in
limited to its
the context of
definition, with
scientism and
some
postmodernism is
demonstration that provided and
its full application sufficiently
and significance is demonstrates a
grasped, even if
grasp of the
minimally.
meaning of these
concepts.
The analysis
answers all seven
questions
thoughtfully and in
a detailed manner.
The analysis hints
at the
interconnection of
the questions and
their implications.
Thesis and/or main Thesis and/or main
claim are
claim are apparent
insufficiently
and appropriate to
developed and/or purpose.
vague; purpose is
not clear.
The analysis
answers all seven
questions
thoughtfully and in
a detailed manner.
The analysis
recognizes the
interconnection of
the questions and
their implications.
5
Excellent
100.00%
Several possible
definitions of the
term spirituality,
including from the
text, are clearly
articulated and
distinguished.
Description of how
spirituality is
broadly defined in
the context of
scientism and
postmodernism is
provided and clearly
demonstrates a
grasp of the
meaning of these
concepts.
The analysis
answers all seven
questions
thoughtfully and in
a detailed manner.
The analysis
thoroughly explains
the interconnection
of the questions and
their implications.
Thesis and/or main Thesis and/or main
claim are clear and claim are
forecast the
comprehensive. The
development of the essence of the paper
paper. It is
is contained within
descriptive and
the thesis. Thesis
reflective of the
statement makes
arguments and
the purpose of the
appropriate to the paper clear.
purpose.
8.0 % Argument Statement of
Sufficient
Argument is
Argument shows Clear and
Logic and
purpose is not
justification of
orderly, but may
logical progression. convincing
Construction
justified by the
claims is lacking. have a few
Techniques of
argument presents a
conclusion. The
Argument lacks
inconsistencies. The argumentation are persuasive claim in
conclusion does not consistent unity. argument presents evident. There is a a distinctive and
support the claim There are obvious minimal
smooth
compelling manner.
made. Argument is flaws in the logic. justification of
progression of
All sources are
incoherent and uses Some sources have claims. Argument claims from
authoritative.
noncredible sources. questionable
logically, but not
introduction to
credibility.
thoroughly,
conclusion. Most
supports the
5.0 % Mechanics
of Writing
(includes
spelling,
punctuation,
grammar,
language use)
Surface errors are Frequent and
pervasive enough repetitive
that they impede
mechanical errors
communication of distract the reader.
meaning.
Inconsistencies in
Inappropriate word language choice
choice or sentence (register) or word
construction is used. choice are present.
Sentence structure
is correct but not
varied.
10.0 %Format
5.0 % Paper
Template is not
Format (use of
used appropriately,
appropriate style or documentation
for the major and format is rarely
assignment)
followed correctly.
5.0 %
Documentation
of Sources
(citations,
footnotes,
references,
bibliography,
etc., as
appropriate to
assignment and
style)
100 % Total
Weightage
Sources are not
documented.
Appropriate
template is used,
but some elements
are missing or
mistaken. A lack of
control with
formatting is
apparent.
Documentation of
sources is
inconsistent or
incorrect, as
appropriate to
assignment and
style, with
numerous
formatting errors.
purpose. Sources
used are credible.
Introduction and
conclusion bracket
the thesis.
Some mechanical
errors or typos are
present, but are not
overly distracting
to the reader.
Correct and varied
sentence structure
and audienceappropriate
language are
employed.
sources are
authoritative.
Appropriate
template is used.
Formatting is
correct, although
some minor errors
may be present.
Appropriate
All format elements
template is fully
are correct.
used. There are
virtually no errors
in formatting style.
Sources are
documented, as
appropriate to
assignment and
style, although
some formatting
errors may be
present.
Sources are
documented, as
appropriate to
assignment and
style, and format is
mostly correct.
Prose is largely free Writer is clearly in
of mechanical
command of
errors, although a standard, written,
few may be
academic English.
present. The writer
uses a variety of
effective sentence
structures and
figures of speech.
Sources are
completely and
correctly
documented, as
appropriate to
assignment and
style, and format is
free of error.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP