Expert answer:Persuasive Essay : gun control

  

Solved by verified expert:2500 words need for persuasive essay 1。read the instruction that i post, then follow the instruction step by step, 2: the essay should use the my Annotated bibliography that i already done for it. Make sure you follow the instruction step by step . there are no plagiarism !!!! thanks for helping
persuasive_essay_prompt.docx

20180423032041annotated_bibliography_revised.doc

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Expert answer:Persuasive Essay : gun control
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Persuasive Essay Prompt
Description:
Your goal for this essay is to write a persuasive essay on a controversial issue about a
problem or something that you would like changed that is closely relevant to your life at
UNH or back home. Choose a group of stakeholders involved in that controversy and write an
essay that attempts to persuade the members of that group to change something about their
argument, view, or actions. You might critique the group’s methods, neglect of the opposition’s
interests/concerns, use of support, etc., or you might want to persuade the group to change their
stance on the debate.
Treatment of Audience
Even if you disagree with a group’s views, you’ll want to assume they have good
motives. You may want to assure them (directly/indirectly) of your confidence in those motives.
You’ll need to admit to the limitations of your side’s arguments as well since the stakeholders
you’re addressing will be skeptical about your viewpoint. Try to discover common ground
between you. Do you and this group of stakeholders share any beliefs, values, or concerns? Did
you ever feel as this group does, and if so, can you discuss your change of heart with your
audience?
Remember that your goal here is not to attack this group for their argument, but to appeal
to their reason or emotions. You want your audience to understand or come to share your point of
view about the debate or about what methods they should employ to be more persuasive. If you
want to convince the group to change their arguments or the design of their web site or campaign,
you’ll need to clarify why it’s worthwhile for that group of stakeholders to do so.
Regardless of your standpoint, you’ll want to remember that your suggestions, ideas,
and/or views may be unwelcome; sensitivity to the group’s views, values, and needs is
particularly important in this essay. You do not want to simply write a paper taking a position (I
am against gun control) and then discussing the different reasons you hold this position; this
approach, while perhaps appropriate for a general audience, will probably not address the
concerns of this particular audience and thus fail in its purpose: to persuade.
You will want to think about your audience’s values and beliefs as well as their
motivations for coming to the table to discuss this controversy with you. Given their needs and
values, you should consider which means of persuasion are open to you. You can draw upon the
various rhetorical strategies we’ve discussed in the first unit and then choose which strategies will
best help you persuade this particular audience.
Persuasive Essay Prompt
Style
The style of this paper will be in the form of a letter to a specific person, group of people, or
organization. The level of formality of your essay will depend on your audience.
*All essays will include one short personal narrative (about one paragraph in length) as
part of the evidence. This narrative may be oriented toward pathos appeal or logos appeal as you
wish and as is appropriate for your audience.
Research
Remember that establishing your credibility is essential when trying to persuade. You’ll
want to use appeals, avoid fallacies, and utilize the methods that best suit your purpose. You will
be starting with six sources from your annotated bibliography, but you may remove any of those
or add any new ones that you want during the course of writing and continuing to research your
topic. By the final draft of your persuasive essay you should include the number and type of
sources that you need to make your argument complete and persuasive for your audience.
Format for Final Draft
Your essay should be 4-7 pages, typed, and double-spaced, with one-inch margins, size
12 font, and page numbers. Use a header that includes your name, the class number, and the date.
Include a centered title with APA format.
Annotated Bibliography
Gun Control
Crooker, C. E. (2003). Gun control and gun rights. Greenwood Publishing Group.
The book Gun Control and Gun rights were written back in 2003 and published by Greenwood
Publishing Group. In this book, Crooker gives the history of weapon control in the United States
since the time of the country’s independence. Giving detailed accounts of the various gun control
advocates and how they advocated for these rights all along. He writes about the cause of the
American civil war and why the war became escalated because of the number of Americans who
owned guns during that time. He writes how the issue of gun control was viewed in the early
days of this United States. I want to use this book in my research on my gun control paper
because it shows the history of my topic and details of how different leaders have dealt with the
issue, politically and socially. Crooker has written about various campaigns in the past for the
gun control act and how it was debated the sections that were emendated and why and how
Americans got the act that is in use today.
Kopel, D. B. (1991). Canadian Gun Control: be supposed to the United States Refer to their
Counterparts in the North for a Solution to its Firearms crisis.Temp. Int’l & Comp. LJ, 5,
1.
Canadian Gun Control is an article written by Kopel in 1991 that was published by Int’l and
Comp. Kopel. In his articles, Kobel says that Americans should look north to Canada about their
gun control act and stop emulating the British and Japanese government who has very strict rules
governing licensed firearm holders. He further explains that The Canadians have had a good and
workable gun control rights for decades and it has always worked for them. Therefore he does
not see why a similar act should not work for the Americans as long as the government gives
licenses to people of integrity and the ones who have a reason for having them. Since he clearly
describes why Americans should allow controlled and licensed firearms and gives the various
reasons for it, this will be a really valuable resource for me in the paper on gun control.
Therefore I plan to use this particular resource to show the importance of people owning firearms
especially in personal security matters that Kopel describes at length. In his conclusion, he notes
that too many weapons in the hands of the public would easily create an ungovernable nation
hence a reason to control the number of guns in the public.
Wolpert, R. M., & Gimpel, J. G. (1998). Self-interest, politics, and public attitude toward gun
control. Political Behavior, 20(3), 241-262.
In his article Wolpert R.M alongside with Girmpel, show the relationship of politics, personal
interest and the public perception of the contentious issue of gun control. The article is generally
about the impact of gun control to the Americans in terms of politics and self-interest. The
reason why I intend to use this article as one of my references is to show the importance of
controlling the number licensed guns amongst the public.In addition, Wolpert writes how the
public feels unsafe and cannot trust each other if every citizen owned a gun. He gives various
cases that have resulted in causalities and properties lose due to rogue licensed gun holders. The
writer gives his reason to advocate for the gun control policy but stating that a government
cannot be able to avail a police officer to every citizen. With his reasoning that the more guns
amongst the public will result to more crimes and that only the mentally tested people with a
good track record of integrity should be allowed to have weapons after clearly proofing if they
really need one.
Kleck, G., & Bordua, D. J. (1983). The factual foundation for certain key assumptions of gun
control. Law & Policy, 5(3), 271-298.
This is an article about law and policies of the government and it clearly disagrees with those
who support the gun control policy. It says people should be given the right to defend themselves
and therefore do not see why the government should control the number of weapons owned by
the public. Kleck, who is the writer of this articles goes ahead and explains that government
should only be concerned about the rogue gun holders but not the number of those who own the
guns. He gives examples of a case where people could have saved their lives if only they had a
weapon for themselves.
The reason why I want to use this valuable resource in my papers is to refer on the instances that
have been described by Kleck that shows why the citizen should be allowed to possess more
guns and that the government should lighten the laws on licensing these weapons.
Funk, T. M. (1994). Gun control and economic discrimination: The melting-point case-in-point.
J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 85, 764.
Funk wrote an article about gun control and how the issue discriminates people in the economic
lines. In the year 1994 when this articles was published, Funk says that crime had risen because
of the few licensed guns in the public domain he father asserts that if the government could
really create a free licensed gun act, the robbery with violence will automatically be decrease
dramatically because no one would be ready to confront another person knowing well that they
the opponent is armed. Although we may never accomplish his goal, an increase on the people
with guns would definitely result to less crime. He tell the government that it should first start
issuing the firearms to the people that it know that they live in territories of criminal gangs and
then make the next step of arming the borders by arming loyal citizens in the borders of United
States. I would like to use this as my reference article in showing why guns among the citizens
of a country should not be restricted. And that licensing more firearms would result to more
security in the country.
Kim, S. C. (2001). Pros and Cons: Social Policy Debates of Our Times. Allyn & Bacon.
In this article, Kim.S.C he wrote on the advantages and disadvantages in regards to the issue of
gun control. Published by Allyn and Bacon, Kim outlines why the government should enact laws
to regulate the number of weapons it licenses and it should not regulate them among its citizens.
One of his reason why the government should not control the weapons it to provide more
security to its citizens by protecting themselves. Also, more security companies to be allowed
access to more and sophisticated weapons to counter the ever-growing challenge of insecurity. I
will use this article in my paper on gun control because it gives some concrete information why
guns should not be controlled. The writer clearly explains his reasons with examples and
therefore I believe this is a rich resource for the information that I will be referring.
Reference
Crooker, C. E. (2003). Gun control and gun rights. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Kopel, D. B. (1991). Canadian Gun Control: be supposed to the United States Refer to their
Counterparts in the North for a Solution to its Firearms crisis.Temp. Int’l & Comp. LJ, 5,
1.
Wolpert, R. M., & Gimpel, J. G. (1998). Self-interest, politics, and public attitude toward gun
control. Political Behavior, 20(3), 241-262.
Kleck, G., & Bordua, D. J. (1983). The factual foundation for certain key assumptions of gun
control. Law & Policy, 5(3), 271-298.
Funk, T. M. (1994). Gun control and economic discrimination: The melting-point case-in-point.
J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 85, 764.
Kim, S. C. (2001). Pros and Cons: Social Policy Debates of Our Times. Allyn & Bacon.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP