top answer: EDSP 429 Case Study: A Broken Arm Spelling was impossible for Jim, despite the accommodations made

  

EDSP 429

Case Study: A Broken Arm

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
top answer: EDSP 429 Case Study: A Broken Arm Spelling was impossible for Jim, despite the accommodations made
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay

Spelling was impossible for Jim, despite the accommodations made by his resource teacher. He was doing well in all his subjects but a new teacher this year who considered spelling a necessary life skill insisted that he perform as well as the other students. Jim’s embarrassment over the weekly posting of spelling grades was jeopardizing his successes.

Mary King had been a resource teacher for students with learning disabilities at Crossroads High School for five years. as she began her fifteenth year of teaching, she looked forward to co-teaching a tenth-grade English class,  which included seven students with learning disabilities. Helen Williams, the English teacher with whom she would co-teach, was a twenty-year veteran who had spent the last seven years at a local middle school. Due to recent cutbacks, she had been forced to accept a position at Crossroads teaching English. This was her first experience teaching high school and her first experience co-teaching. She was not happy about either.

When the two teachers met to plan how they would co-teach the class, Helen informed Mary that there was a lot of content to cover in the English curriculum. “You know the students are going to have a district-wide semester exam at the end of the term. I am going to be held accountable for their mastery of this content.” She went on to suggest that because she was the English teacher, she should present the content while Mary circulated around the room to monitor students and answer questions.

“This semester we will start by reading Julius Caesar and every Friday there will be a spelling test that will constitute one-fourth of the grade,” Helen went on to explain.  She was adamant that spelling was a necessary life skill, and that it should be a part of the English curriculum. Mary expressed her concern about Helen’s position on spelling because of the challenge spelling presented for many students with learning disabilities. “Well, why don’t you take your students with learning disabilities out into the common area and give them some extra help?” Helen suggested.

Mary decided not to confront Helen but rather to accept her approach to teaching the class. She thought that as they became more comfortable working together, she could ease Helen into a more collaborative style of co-teaching.

One of the students who would be in the co-taught class was Jim O’Hara, a six-foot-tall, 200-pound, 17-year-old. Jim was born prematurely but quickly caught up and experienced no other complications until he entered school. He was identified as having language learning delays and auditory processing deficits when he was in the second grade and was enrolled in a special education program for students with learning disabilities. He had managed to successfully keep up with his classmates due to some instructional modifications and support from the learning disabilities resource teachers at his school. He was a very motivated student and his parents were proud of his academic accomplishments.

On Monday of the first week, Helen gave the students twelve spelling words to study and told them they would be tested on Friday. The words were well below the reading level of most of the students in the class and Helen felt it was reasonable to expect tenth-grade students to spell seventh or eighth-grade words.

Friday, when Mary took her students and a few others out in the common area to give them their spelling test, she was dismayed to see that Jim had gotten every word wrong. “I’ll have to back up a bit here,” she thought and made a mental note to catch Jim early next week and plan some new spelling strategies.

The following week she gave Jim six words on Monday and six words on Tuesday. She helped him make flashcards and showed him how to study using the flashcards at home, but again he missed all 12 words on Friday’s test. When she looked at Jim’s records that afternoon, Mary found that he was operating on a 4th grade level in language arts, and a 1st grade level in spelling. “No wonder he is having so much trouble on these tests,” she said to herself. Jim was doing adequate work on the literature section of the course because all of the stories were being read out loud in class. “Spelling could definitely keep this student from making a passing grade in this class even though he’s doing fine in the other areas,” Mary thought. But, because she knew Jim was a motivated student (He was making A’s and B’s in math and science and a C’s in history.), she was optimistic that she could find a way to adapt the spelling requirement so that he could be successful.

In the following weeks, Mary attempted presenting four words, three days a week with no success. When she dropped it down to three words, four days a week Jim was able to get one out of three correct, but Mary knew that would not be good enough to bring up his grade.

Mary approached Helen during their planning time on Friday. “Helen, we need to modify Jim’s spelling test in some way or he is not going to get a passing grade in this class,” Mary pointed out. “How about allowing him to pick the correct spelling word out of a choice of three, or perhaps match the word in a sentence?” she suggested hopefully.

“That will not work because those skills do not test spelling!” Helen replied. “I will have to average his spelling scores into his grade for the first nine weeks. Spelling is something everyone must be able to do to pass this class! I don’t think it would be fair to lower that standard or my expectations for him or anyone else.”

“Helen, I don’t think spelling is a skill that Jim will ever be able to master. It is simply part of his disability. If he had a broken arm would you still expect him to write, or read printed material if he were blind?” she pointed out as tactfully as possible.

“Of course not!” Helen bristled, “but this is not the same!”

“Yes it is!” argued Mary.

“Educated people must be able to spell! I know I have high standards, but I want the best for my students,” Helen replied. As far as she was concerned, that was the end of the conversation. Mary, however, was not satisfied. Jim was facing a failing grade in English, with no solution in sight. And worse, he was becoming frustrated and had begun to skip class.

Mary called Jim’s home later in the week to talk with Mrs. O’Hara about Jim’s problems with spelling, as well as his numerous absences from class. “He is so frustrated and embarrassed,” Mrs. O’Hara confided. “The spelling grades are posted in the class and everyone knows that Jim is the one who is making the zero grade every week.”

“I don’t blame him for not wanting to come to class,” Mary thought as she hung up the phone. “I have got to do better for Jim, but how can I convince Helen to give him a break?”

This issue had already put a strain on the two teachers’ relationship and Mary was hesitant to confront Helen about Jim again. It would not be good for them to become adversaries, especially so early in the year. Mary believed, however, that it was her responsibility to help Jim succeed in this class.

Mary decided to approach Jim about returning to a self-contained English class for students with learning disabilities. “I feel normal when I’m in class with everyone else. When you go to the LD room, everyone knows why you are there. Please don’t ask me to go back,” Jim pleaded.

“What am I going to do?” Mary thought to herself.

Discussion/Study Questions

Explain what you learned/know about each of the characters in the case.

What do you think is motivating the thoughts/actions of each of the characters?

What are the issues/problems in the case?

What are your recommendations for an effective resolution to the problems?

References

A Broken Arm. Retrieved from University of South Florida College of Education Clearinghouse

for Special Education Teaching Classes website:

http://cases.coedu.usf.edu/TCases/a_broken_arm.htm

Page 1 of 4

EDSP 429

Case Study: A Broken Arm Assignment Instructions

Overview

The purpose of this case analysis is to show your ability to apply course concepts and vocabulary to the educational scenario presented. When faced with a difficult situation in an educational setting, it is important to be able to apply your knowledge to resolve the problem in a way that is understood by all involved. In completing this assignment, you will use theories, vocabulary, and models to answer the questions provided at the end of the scenario demonstrating your knowledge and ability to provide a solution to the issue.

Instructions

1. Read the Case Study: A Broken Arm provided with this assignment.

2. Complete the questions at the end of the case study based on synthesized course materials and the information gleaned from the case study. Your responses must be written in clear and concise language that shows your ability to synthesize course material and relate it to real-life educational solutions.

3. In your recommendations for an effective solution, support your opinions with strong evidence, citing sources in current APA format. Present a balanced view that is both reasonable and objective.

4. Utilize a professional writing style. Support your answers with thoughtful research and document all sources of information in current APA format. Each answer must be at least 150 words.

5. Include a references page in current APA format.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
colle writers

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP