Summarize case study 1 ( pg 399)? in 4 to 5 paragraphs and give your thoughts in a paragraph. B. Answer the following 3 questions: 1. What are the et


Home>Business & Finance homework help>Marketing homework help

A. Summarize case study 1 ( pg 399)  in 4 to 5 paragraphs and give your thoughts in a paragraph.
B. Answer the following 3 questions:
1. What are the ethical challenges that Uber faces in using app-based peer-to-peer sharing technology? 
2. Since Uber is using a disruptive business model and marketing strategy, what are the risks that the company will have to overcome to be successful? 
3. Because Uber is so popular and the business model is being expanded to other industries, should there be regulation to develop compliance with standards to protect competitors and consumers? 
C. Summarize “What will you do? (Core Tex) and gives your thoughts on what you will do?

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Summarize case study 1 ( pg 399)? in 4 to 5 paragraphs and give your thoughts in a paragraph. B. Answer the following 3 questions: 1. What are the et
Just from $10/Page
Order Essay


Case 1 Uber Fuels Controversy 399
This case was prepared by Jennifer Sawayda for and under the direction of O.C. Ferrell and Linda Ferrell © 2019. It was prepared for classroom discus- sion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative, ethical, or legal decision by management. All sources used for this case were obtained through publicly available material and the Uber website.
Uber Fuels Controversy
Introduction Uber Technologies Inc. is a multinational transporta- tion company that provides ride-sharing services, food delivery, freight shipping, and electric bike rentals. Uber was founded in San Francisco in 2009 and has since expanded their operations to more than 700 cities in 85 countries around the world. The company has become a key player in the sharing economy, a new economic model in which independent contractors rent out their underutilized resources, such as vehicles or lodging, to other consumers. The company has experienced resounding success and is looking to expand both within the United States and internationally.
Due to their utilization of technology, Uber does not have as many constraints as taxi cab companies do. A major reason Uber is so popular is because their app allows users to request a ride from drivers in the near vicinity. Uber’s business model, which is based on independent contractors instead of employees, takes advantage of smartphone technology by linking consum- ers with independent drivers as their cabs, but they do not employ drivers or own the vehicles. Drivers receive a commission from Uber, but they do not report to Uber and are their own boss. This provides a potentially more efficient and less expensive way for consumers to purchase transportation. This business model has contributed to the rise of the sharing economy in which independent contractors, drivers in this case, can rent out underutilized resources to earn money.
Global Expansion Challenges International expansion is a major part of Uber’s market- ing strategy. Adopting the motto “think local to expand global,” Uber believes that consumers from other countries will appreciate their low cost, convenience, and freedom. As it expands into different countries, Uber is engaging in strategic partnerships with local companies. These alliances with local firms are especially important because they allow Uber to utilize the resources and knowledge of domestic firms familiar with the country’s culture.
Despite Uber’s international success, many countries have regulatory hurdles that have caused trouble for the company. Perhaps the biggest hurdle is Uber’s failure to mandate that their drivers obtain the same license types as professional taxi drivers even though Uber drivers
offer many of the same services as professionally licensed taxi drivers. Governments have responded by banning Uber—and the services provided via Uber—due to the company’s nonenforcement of professional licenses for their drivers. For instance, in Spain, Uber was forced to shut down ride-sharing services after a judge ruled that Uber drivers were not legally authorized to transport passengers, claiming that Uber created unfair competi- tion for professionally licensed taxi drivers. Because the taxi industry is important in many cities, governments like Spain’s are not looking favorably at what they view as an unfair competitive advantage that could poten- tially bankrupt the industry. Uber returned to Spain in March 2018 with UberX, a tier of Uber service that uses professionally licensed drivers, placing it more on par with licensed taxi drivers. However, in 2019, Uber and their Spanish competitor Cabify announced that they were suspending services in Barcelona after a new law was passed requiring all vehicles to be booked with at least 15 minutes advance notice.
Uber faced similar problems in France. In 2011, Paris became the first city outside of the United States where Uber set up operations. However, local authorities attempted to ban one of Uber’s services because drivers did not need to be professionally licensed. French police even raided Uber’s Paris office. French law mandates that operating a service that connects passengers to nonprofessional drivers is punishable with fines of over $300,000 and up to two years in prison. Hundreds of Uber drivers in France were issued fines for operating illegally, which Uber paid.
Uber challenged that law, claiming that it was uncon- stitutional because it hindered free enterprise. A French court decided against banning Uber’s service and sent the case to a higher court. This generated strong criticism from taxicab officials in France as they maintained that they had to have professionally licensed drivers while Uber was free from this restriction. French courts later ruled against Uber, and the company is no longer allowed to use nonprofessional drivers in the country. However, their past use of nonprofessional drivers continues to haunt Uber. The European Union determined that France could file criminal charges against Uber for their UberPOP service as it had used nonprofessional drivers to operate an illegal taxi service. In another landmark ruling, French courts sided with an Uber driver who claimed he should be recognized as an employee, not
C B P _ F errell_ C a s e _ Studie s.indd 399 12/9/2019 6:23:03 P M03/18/2020 – tp-70a028a4-6922-11ea-a484-024 (temp temp) – Business and Society

400 Case 1 Uber Fuels Controversy
an independent contractor. A similar ruling had been made in the United Kingdom. Uber has stated they will challenge these rulings.
India is Uber’s second largest market after the United States. In New Delhi, a woman’s rape allegation led to a ban against app-based services without radio-taxi per- mits in the capital. In response to the alleged rape, Uber began updating their app to include panic button and tracking features. Uber also began offering their service in New Delhi without charging booking or service fees. The company came under fire for how they compensate Indian drivers. As Uber came closer to releasing their initial public offering (IPO), which was filed in May 2019, they began to reduce driver incentives to build up financial performance. As a result, reduced incentives and higher diesel prices negatively impacted Indian driv- ers’ financial earnings, causing growing discontent. Uber must tread carefully to seize upon opportunities in India without violating regulatory requirements or damaging relationships with their drivers.
In 2015, a German court banned Uber services if they used nonprofessional drivers. Uber argued that the company itself is only an agent to connect driver and rider. Rules that apply to taxi services do not apply, and all services are deemed to be legal, according to Uber. The court ruled that Uber’s business model clearly infringes the Personal Transportation Law, because driv- ers transport riders without a personal transportation license. The injunction includes a fine of more than $260,000 per ride for non-compliance. If the injunction is breached, drivers could go to jail for up to half a year, in addition to an imposition of fines. The German Taxi Association (Taxi Deutschland) was pleased with the outcome and claimed that taxi services will remain in the hands of qualified people and keep everyone safer. Uber can operate UberX, Uber Green, and UberTaxi in Germany, but drivers need a professional chauffeur’s license to do so.
Uber faces many regulatory and legal issues outside of the United States. The company attempted to take a global approach to expansion by applying the same practices in other countries as they do in the United States. However, they are quickly realizing that they must take a more customized approach. Laws differ from country to country. Although Uber defines themselves as an “agent” of their “individual contractors,” many courts do not view their services in the same way. They are forcing Uber to comply with licensing laws or stop business in certain areas.
Threats to the Sharing Economy There is an ongoing threat to the sharing economy in which Uber operates: worker classification. Under cur- rent U.S. law, a worker either depends on an organization as an employee or is self-employed as an independent contractor. The rise of Uber and other digital matching
apps has called worker classification into question. This has been a widespread concern because employees receive workplace protections such as minimum wage and overtime pay that independent contractors do not.
Some consider the independent relationships between Uber and their drivers to be beneficial because of the flexibility and personal control for the drivers. However, lawmakers fear companies are evading U.S. labor laws to the detriment of the contractors. California legislators passed Assembly Bill 5 in 2019 which classifies contract workers for companies such as Uber as employees. The bill expands the 2018 California Supreme Court decision known as Dynamex. Together, they established a three-point test, often referred to as the ABC test, to determine if a worker is an employee: (1) the company controls the employee’s work; (2) the employee’s work is a core part of the company’s business; (3) the workers don’t typically engage in providing their service to other companies. This poses a major threat to Uber who relies on low-cost, flexible labor. Not only will labor costs increase, but Uber is also concerned they may have to limit the number of drivers or schedule drivers in advance in the long term, eliminating the ability for drivers to work as often or as little as they desire.
This landmark California bill has the potential to influence legislation in other states. Labor groups in states such as New York support similar legislation. Uber unsuccessfully lobbied to be exempt from the bill in exchange for establishing minimum pay rates for drivers, paid time off, and an association to protect the interests of drivers. Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash pledged $90 million to support lobbying efforts to support exemption. It is estimated by officials in the industry that switching to an employee model could increase costs 20 to 30 percent, which would have a significant impact on Uber’s bottom line.
Ongoing Controversies While the company continues to be widely successful, the year 2017 was a hard one for Uber. Multiple controversies cast a negative light on the organization. To start off the year, Uber had to pay over $20 million in a settlement for misleading drivers on how much they would earn. In February, a former Uber female engineer published a blog post alleging that there was widespread sexual harassment and gender discrimination at the company, which prompted an investigation into Uber’s corporate culture. This investigation later resulted in 20 employees being fired for various sexual harassment and discrimination violations. In March, five executives left the company, including the senior vice president of engineering.
In April, Uber faced controversy with Apple, Inc. Uber had been secretly identifying and tagging iPhones even after the app and their data had been deleted from the iPhones. Uber tagged these phones to see if users
C B P _ F errell_ C a s e _ Studie s.indd 400 12/9/2019 6:23:03 P M03/18/2020 – tp-70a028a4-6922-11ea-a484-024 (temp temp) – Business and Society

Case 1 Uber Fuels Controversy 401
were using the same phone to download the app and then repeatedly wiping it so they could use promo codes multiple times. Although Uber was trying to detect fraud and prevent customer abuse, this action violated Apple’s privacy policy. Tim Cook confronted the chief executive of Uber, threatening to remove the app from Apple’s app store if Uber did not stop breaking the policy. The impact would have caused millions of iPhone consumers to lose access to the Uber app. The CEO at the time, Travis Kalanick, had developed a reputation for bending or sometimes breaking the rules in order to drive the company toward desired goals. Since their founding in 2009, Uber has gained a negative reputation for chal- lenging the rules and causing disruption.
In May, the U.S. Department of Justice launched a criminal investigation for the company’s use of “Greyball.” This secret software identified users who were violating the terms of services and denied ride requests to them. The users simply never got paired with a driver on the app. This software even targeted govern- ment officials who were using the app to investigate Uber and their drivers. There was controversy over the use of this software as to whether it was in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which bans the use of bribes to foreign officials to get or keep business.
In June, Uber fired top executive Eric Alexander for obtaining medical records of an Uber passenger who was raped by her driver for the purpose of casting doubt upon her case. Uber held an all-staff meeting to discuss reforming company culture, which was immediately fol- lowed by CEO Travis Kalanick taking a leave of absence. This ultimately led to Dara Khosrowshahi becoming his successor as CEO in August.
In September, the FBI investigated Uber’s software for allegedly illegally interfering with competitors. The internal program, known by Uber as “Hell,” could track drivers working for the competitor Lyft. The investiga- tion revealed that Uber created fake Lyft customer accounts to “request” rides around different cities in order to see how many Lyft drivers were nearby and what prices they were being offered for various routes around the cities. The program was also able to identify drivers who worked for both Lyft and Uber in order to give these drivers incentives to leave Lyft. The program was presumably used from 2014 to 2016. The ability to recruit and maintain drivers is a critical component of how these ride-share companies operate. Every major city has users who engage with both apps to determine the most cost-effective option for their trips. Having inside knowledge of the competition and being able to dominate the market in this way was invaluable toward gaining more customers on a more consistent basis. On the other hand, these activities can also violate laws on fair competition.
In September, Uber lost their license to operate in London due to a lack of corporate responsibil- ity. There were questions about Uber’s approach to
reporting serious driver offenses, driver medical and safety checks, and the use of previously mentioned “Greyball” software. The mayor of London stated that all companies must play by the rules and adhere to standards that involve customer safety—innovation should not come at the expense of customer safety and security. Uber appealed the decision soon after. Several months later, Uber was given a 15-month probationary license to operate in London. Uber acknowledged the past events and made changes to address them. The firm said they changed their senior leadership, updated and improved various policies, strengthened their corporate governance, and was taking initiatives to transform their corporate culture overall.
In November, it was revealed that Uber faced a data breach in 2016. During the breach, email addresses, names, and phone numbers of 50 million global Uber riders were stolen. The personal information of drivers was also compromised, including driver’s license num- bers. Uber had an obligation to report hacking incidents to regulators and drivers whose information was taken. However, at the time Uber kept the data breach quiet by paying the hackers to delete the data. They were in the process of negotiating with the Federal Trade Commission about the proper handling of consumer data. Uber reported that they believed none of the data was used by the hackers and offered free identity theft protection and monitoring to victims of the hacking. The data breach was not made public until almost a year after it occurred. As a result of this incident, the chief security officer and the legal director of security and law enforcement were fired.
Uber also faced difficulties with accidents and tragedies outside the inner-company operations. In 2018, a self-driving Uber car struck and killed a pedestrian in one of the first video recorded accidents involving the death of a pedestrian. It was found that the vehicle feature that carries out emergency brakes for dangerous situations was disabled by Uber to prevent erratic vehicle behavior. Uber settled a civil case with the pedestrian’s family, and Arizona prosecutors decided not to criminally charge Uber. It seemed unclear whether the car or the victim was at fault. Uber responded by suspending their self-driving program for a few months and resuming the program after changing their approach to self-driving vehicles.
Another tragedy brought Uber attention in 2019 when University of South Carolina student Samantha Josephson was murdered after getting into a car she mistook for an Uber. Following her death Uber promoted awareness, reminding riders to verify their drivers through notifications and ads. The university encouraged students and riders everywhere to ask their driver “What is my name?” to confirm they were in the correct vehicle. Uber stated they had been working with college campuses since 2017 to educate students on detecting fake ride-share drivers and will continue to do so to help prevent future
C B P _ F errell_ C a s e _ Studie s.indd 401 12/9/2019 6:23:03 P M03/18/2020 – tp-70a028a4-6922-11ea-a484-024 (temp temp) – Business and Society

402 Case 1 Uber Fuels Controversy
incidents. Additionally, the South Carolina House of Representatives passed a bill requiring ride-sharing driv- ers to display illuminated company signs in their vehicle to further prove their validity to riders.
Other Business Segments Rather than a ride-sharing company, Uber views itself as a technology and transportation company. Uber has greatly expanded their offerings by exploring food delivery, bike rentals, business transportation solutions, and more.
Food Delivery In 2014, Uber launched Uber Eats. The app gives users the ability to order food from participating local restaurants. Now, Uber had partnered with more than 100,000 restaurants around the globe. While Uber Eats does not hold the highest market share in the industry, falling behind Grubhub and DoorDash, it still provides Uber with a large revenue source and holds 25 percent of the market for on-demand food delivery services. Uber has also invested at least $2 billion to research autonomous vehicles and test different fleets of these vehicles. Uber entered the autonomous vehicle field in 2015 by partnering with Carnegie Mellon University.
Freight In 2017, Uber launched Uber Freight, a service that connects shipping companies with drivers. The service, which operates similarly to Uber’s core ride-sharing app, has seen triple-digit revenue growth, expanding both nationally and internationally. Freight transportation represents a huge opportunity for Uber, especially as the United States faces a shortage of truck drivers. Now that Uber has established themselves as a pillar of the sharing economy, Uber stands to be a big player in this segment.
Bike Rentals Uber expanded their offerings by introducing JUMP, an electric bike rental system through their app. The bikes, first introduced in 2018, create an easy solution for commuters in highly populated cities. Many fear for the long-term success of e-bike and scooter rentals. In the beginning, scooter rentals hit the streets at incredibly low prices due to subsidized pricing. This resulted in many rental services such as Bird operating at a financial loss. Now, services like Uber and Lyft have increased prices at the risk of turning off customers.
The Future As Uber looks to the future, they are investing in advanced transportation technology to stay ahead of the curve. Despite setbacks with their autonomous vehicles,
Uber is working with teams in Detroit, Pittsburgh, San Francisco, Tempe, and Toronto on both self-driving cars and self-driving freight trucks. Even in the face of safety concerns, Uber believes self-driving vehicles to be safer and more sustainable than traditional vehicles. Additionally, Uber has a team called Uber Elevate that is working to develop aerial ridesharing by 2023 in Dallas, Los Angeles, and Melbourne. Uber will face many regulation challenges and ethical concerns with this uncharted territory. They will need to work closely with local and national governments to establish safety standards for urban aviation.
Uber Becomes a Public Company Uber filed for an initial public offering in 2019 soon after competitor Lyft was listed on NASDAQ in March 2019. The Uber IPO was one of the biggest of all time with a value of $82.2 billion, just behind Facebook at a valuation of $115 billion and Alibaba at $179 billion at the date of their IPOs. All 180 million shares of Uber stock were sold out within three days of the IPO. Uber’s initial stock price was $45 a share, raising a total of $8.1! billion at a valuation of $82.2 billion in total. The valuation makes it the largest U.S.-listed IPO since Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. went public in 2014.
Uber took a conservative pricing approach for their stock after observing that their competitor Lyft experienced a 20 percent decrease in stock prices in the weeks following the Lyft IPO. Although there was demand for the shares at higher prices, Uber put them in the hands of as many institutional investors as possible, aiming for more long-term-oriented investments rather than hedge-fund and retail investors. Though the stock price at the time of this writing was down to $31 per share, Uber believes they hold a promising future and that their business will become increasingly necessary as people around the world move toward hiring self- driving vehicles and using electric bikes and scooters instead of owning cars.
Conclusion Despite Uber’s challenges, the company has become widely popular among consumers and independent con- tractors. Supporters claim that Uber is revolutionizing the transportation service industry. Investors clearly believe Uber is going to be strong in the market in the long run. One lesson that Uber will hopefully take to heart is the need to ensure that independent contrac- tors using their app obey relevant country laws. The company also must revamp their corporate culture to prevent more legal repercussions. Uber has to address these issues to uphold the trust of customers and achieve long-term market success in different countries.
C B P _ F errell_ C a s e _ Studie s.indd 402 12/9/2019 6:23:03 P M03/18/2020 – tp-70a028a4-6922-11ea-a484-024 (temp temp) – Business and Society

Case 1 Uber Fuels Controversy 403
Questions for Discussion 1. What are the ethical challenges that Uber faces in using
app-based peer-to-peer sharing technology? 2. Since Uber is using a disruptive business model and
marketing strategy, what are the risks that the company will have to overcome to be successful?
3. Because Uber is so popular and the business model is being expanded to other industries, should there be regulation to develop compliance with standards to protect competitors and consumers?
Sources “Uberworld,” The Economist, September 3, 2016, 9. Akiko Fujita, “Uber’s Trucking Chief Says Triple Digit Growth
is ‘Very Sustainable’,” Yahoo! Finance, August 22, 2019, digit-growth-very-sustainable-145242968.html (accessed August!22, 2019).
Alana Semuels, “‘I’m Back to Riding My Own Bike.’ Higher Prices Threaten Silicon Valley’s Mobility Revolution,” TIME, August 9, 2019, scooter-subsidies/ (accessed August 22, 2019).
Angie Schmitt, “Uber Got Off the Hook for Killing a Pedestrian with its Self-Driving Car,” Streets Blog USA, https://usa. pedestrian-with-its-self-driving-car/ (accessed June 25, 2019).
Anna Gallegos, “The Four Biggest Legal Problems Facing Uber, Lyft and Other Ridesharing Services,”LXBN, June 4, 2014, uber-lyft-ridesharing-services/ (accessed July 20, 2019).
Anne Stych, “Uber Eats Abandons Flat Fees for Distance- Based Pricing,” Bizwomen, August 10, 2018, https:// www. uber-eats-abandons-flat-fee-for-distance-based.html?page=all (accessed October 16, 2019).
Caitlin Morrison, “Uber Wins Court Appeal over London Ban,” Independent, June 27, 2018, news/business/news/uber-london-ban-wins-court-appeal- overturn-tfl-revoke-licence-a8418106.html (accessed July 20, 2019).
Christopher Mims, “At Startups, People Are ‘New Infrastructure’,” The Wall Street Journal, March 8, 2015, infrastructure-1425858978 (accessed July 20, 2019).
Corrie Driebusch and Maureen Farrell, “Uber Prices IPO at $45 a Share,” The Wall Street Journal, May 9, 2019, https://www. range-or-lower-11557422774 (accessed July 20, 2019).
Danielle Abril, “DoorDash Has Pulled Ahead of GrubHub, Uber Eats in the On-Demand Food Delivery Race,” Fortune, March!11, 2019, tops-grubhub-on-demand-food/ (accessed July 20, 2019).
Eric Auchard and Christoph Steitz, “German Court Bans Uber’s Unlicensed Taxi Services,” Reuters, March 18, 2015, http:// idUSKBN0ME1L820150318 (accessed July 20, 2019).
Eric Newcomer, “Uber Paid Hackers to Delete Stolen Data on 57 Million People,” Bloomberg, November 21, 2017, concealed-cyberattack-that-exposed-57-million-people-s-data (accessed June 25, 2019).
George Harrison, “What is Greyball and Why Is the Uber Software So Controversial?” The Sun, October 3, 2017, software-enforcement-controversial/ (accessed June 29, 2019).
Henry Grabar, “Uber Reveals One of Its Big Vulnerabilities,” Slate, April 12, 2019, ipo-nyc-london-risks.html (accessed July 20, 2019).
Je Seung Lee, “French Court Follows UK in Ruling against Uber in ‘Employment Contract’ Case,” The Telegraph, January 11, 2019, court-follows-uk-ruling-against-uber-employment-contract/ (accessed July 20, 2019).
Jefferson Graham, “App Greases the Wheels,” USA Today, May!27, 2015, 5B.
Joana Sugden and Aditi Malhotra, “Indian Officials Drafting National Rules for Uber, Other Taxi Apps,” The Wall Street Journal, April 7, 2015, indian-officials-drafting-national-rules-for-uber-other-taxi- apps-1428427528 (accessed July 20, 2019).
Julia Carrie Wong and Sam Morris, “Collision Course: Uber’s Terrible 2017,” The Guardian, technology/ng-interactive/2017/dec/27/uber-2017-scandals- investigation (accessed July 20, 2019).
Kate Conger and Noam Scheiber, “California Bill Makes App-Based Companies Treat Workers as Employees,” The New York Times, September 11, 2019, https://www.nytimes. com/2019/09/11/technology/california-gig-economy-bill.html (accessed October 18, 2019).
Kate Taylor and Benjamin Goggin, “49 of the Biggest Scandals in Uber’s History,” Business Insider, May 10, 2019, https://www. 2017-11#april-2019-uber-announces-new-safety-initiative- after-student-killed-in-fake-uber-pick-up-48 (accessed June 26, 2019).
Kaylee Hultgren, “At Uber Elevate, Innovations and Experiential Make Flying Cars a Reality,” Event Marketer, August 7, 2019, innovations-flying-cars/ (accessed August 22, 2019).
Mansoor Iqbal, “Uber Revenue and Usage Statistics,” Business of Apps, May 10, 2019, uber-statistics/#5 (accessed June 29, 2019).
Maria Vega Paul, “Uber Returns to Spanish Streets in Search of Regulatory U-Turn,” Reuters, March 30, 2016, http://www. (accessed July 20, 2019).
Michael Carney, “Playing Favorites: Uber Adds New Security Features, but Only in Select Crisis-Riddled Markets,” PandoDaily, January 2, 2015, playing-favorites-uber-adds-new-security-features-but-only-in- select-crisis-riddled-markets/ (accessed July 20, 2019).
Mihir Zaveri, “Prosecutors Don’t Plan to Charge Uber in Self-Driving Car’s Fatal Accident,” The New York Times, March 6, 2019, technology/uber-self-driving-car-arizona.html (accessed July 21, 2019).
Mike Isaac, “Uber’s C.E.O. Plays With Fire,” The New York Times, April 23, 2017, technology/travis-kalanick-pushes-uber-and-himself-to-the- precipice.html?_r=1 (accessed June 29, 2019).
Nick Bilton, “Disruptions: Taxi Supply and Demand, Priced by the Mile,” The New York Times, January 8, 2012, http://bits. demand-priced-by-the-mile/ (accessed July 20, 2019).
C B P _ F errell_ C a s e _ Studie s.indd 403 12/9/2019 6:23:03 P M03/18/2020 – tp-70a028a4-6922-11ea-a484-024 (temp temp) – Business and Society

404 Case 1 Uber Fuels Controversy
Noam Scheiber, “New Lawsuit Against Uber Is Set to Test Its Classification of Workers,” The New York Times, September 12, 2019, https://www.nytimes. com/2019/09/12/technology/uber-drivers-california. html?searchResultPosition=8 (accessed October 18, 2019).
R. Jai Krishna and Joanna Sugden, “India Asks Internet Service Providers to Block Uber Website in Delhi,” The Wall Street Journal, May 14, 2015, india-asks-internet-service-providers-to-block-uber-website-in- delhi-1431606032 (accessed July 20, 2019).
Rebecca Davis O’Brien and Greg Bensinger, “Uber Faces FBI Probe Over Program Targeting Rival Lyft,” The Wall Street Journal, September 8, 2017, articles/uber-faces-fbi-probe-overprogram-targeting-rival- lyft-1504872001 (accessed June 29, 2019).
Rob Davies, “Uber Suffers Legal Setbacks in France and Germany,” The Guardian, June 9, 2016, https://www. setbacks-in-france-and-germany (accessed

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more
colle writers

Order your essay today and save 30% with the discount code ESSAYSHELP