solved:What is your opinion of this broad interpretation of ‘drivi

  

What is your opinion of this broad interpretation of ‘driving’?Should courts require ‘active movement’ of the vehicle before a driver can be charged – especially with driving while intoxicated? What about a driver having just ‘active control’ over a vehicle – such as sitting behind the wheel with the car in park and legally parked where a vehicle can be located?Should a police officer have to witness movement of a lawfully parked vehicle in order to have reasonable cause to believe that the vehicle has been driven?LawSocial ScienceCriminal Justice CJ 211